High platelet reactivity strongly predicts early stent thrombosis in patients with drug-eluting stent implantation.

Stent thrombosis (ST) is a fatal complication after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The association between P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) level and stent thrombosis occurrence remains unclear. Based on the multicenter, observational PTRG-DES (Platelet function and genoType-Related long-term proGnosis in DES-treated patients) registry of patients with drug-eluting stents (DES) implantation, a total of 11,714 patients with PRU values were analyzed. We sought to identify the predictors of early stent thrombosis (EST) and compared the primary outcome, a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and revascularization, between EST and non-EST groups. EST, defined as definite ST within 1 month after index PCI, occurred in 51 patients. PRU values were significantly higher in the EST group (263.5 ± 70.8 vs. 217.5 ± 78.7, p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, PRU ≥ 252 (OR, 5.10; 95% CI 1.58-16.46; p = 0.006) and aspirin reaction unit ≥ 414 (OR 4.85; 95% CI 1.07-21.97; p = 0.040) were independent predictors of EST. The cumulative incidence of primary composite outcome at one year was significantly higher in the EST group (38.2% vs. 3.9%, Log-rank p < 0.001). In patients treated with clopidogrel after successful DES implantation, EST was associated with higher platelet reactivities, and a greater risk of cardiovascular events.Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT04734028.

Effects of treatment with clopidogrel with or without proton pump inhibitor omeprazole on the risk of ischemic stroke: a nationwide cohort study.

Most proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) inhibit the bioactivation of clopidogrel to its active metabolite. There is controversy concerning whether PPIs alter the effectiveness of clopidogrel in reducing the risk of ischemic stroke (IS). We therefore aimed to examine the risk of IS associated with concomitant use of clopidogrel and omeprazole, a PPI commonly used in clinical settings. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the National Health Insurance Research Database of Taiwan dated from 2000 to 2013. The study cohorts comprised 407 patients diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and with concomitant use of clopidogrel and omeprazole (the exposed cohort), 814 ACS patients with single use of clopidogrel (the comparison cohort), and 230 ACS patients with concurrent use of clopidogrel and pantoprazole (the reference cohort). The primary outcome was incident IS. The hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) derived from the time-dependent Cox regression model were used to assess the association between concomitant use of clopidogrel and omeprazole and the risk of IS. The incidence rate of IS was significantly higher in the exposed cohort (81.67 per 1000 person-years) than in the comparison cohort (57.45 per 1000 person-years), resulting in an adjusted HR of 1.39 (95% CI 1.03-1.74). By contrast, there was no significant difference in the risk of IS between the exposed and reference cohorts (adjusted HR 1.11; 95% CI 0.81-1.52). The present study revealed that patients taking both clopidogrel and omeprazole was associated with an increased risk of IS.

A novel AllGlo probe-quantitative PCR method for detecting single nucleotide polymorphism in CYP2C19 to evaluate the antiplatelet activity of clopidogrel.

CYP2C19 gene has multiple single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), which is the major determinant for clopidogrel treatment responses. Therefore, CYP2C19 SNP detection is essential for predicting clopidogrel efficacy. Currently, there is still no quick and effective method for routine detection of common CYP2C19 SNPs in clinical laboratories, which is critically needed prior to clopidogrel treatment. AllGlo™ based quantitative PCR was used to develop a novel genotyping method for CYP2C19 SNP detection, termed CyPAllGlo. The performance of CyPAllGlo was compared with that of the commonly used fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) method, and the data was verified by DNA sequencing. CyPallGlo was used to identify CYP2C19 polymorphisms in 363 patients with coronary heart disease. The univariate analysis was used to access the antiplatelet efficacy of clopidogrel in patients. The associations between CYP2C19 polymorphisms and clopidogrel efficacy were analyzed. Using CyPAllGlo to detect CYP2C19*2 and CYP2C19*3 alleles was highly specific and fast. The detection limit was approximately 0.07 µg/µl and 0.7 µg/µl for CYP2C19*2 and CYP2C19*3, respectively. The consistency between FISH and CyPAllGlo were 98.07% for CYP2C19*2 and 99.17% for CYP2C19*3. DNA sequencing showed that the accuracy of CyPAllGlo was 100%. The analysis time for the whole CyPAllGlo procedure was approximately 60 min. Univariate analysis showed that the anticoagulation efficacy of clopidogrel was related to patient age, CYP2C19 genotype, metabolic phenotype, and LDL level. The logistic regression analysis showed that the genotype of CYP2C19 and metabolic phenotype was the two risk factors for clopidogrel antiplatelet ineffectiveness. This novel CyPAllGlo is a rapid and accurate method for detection of CYP2C19 SNP. The specificity and consistency of CyPAllGlo are comparable with that of widely used DNA sequencing. These findings provide valuable rapid method for predicting clopidogrel efficacy, which can be quickly translated to improve personalized precision medicine for coronary heart disease treatment.

Impact of renal function on adverse bleeding events associated with dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

It is believed, but not well established, that renal dysfunction increases the risk of adverse bleeding events associated with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), especially in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The aim of this study is to estimate the impact of renal function on adverse bleeding events associated with DAPT in patients with ACS. A total of 1,264 ACS patients who received DAPT, clopidogrel (n = 530) or prasugrel (n = 734) in addition to aspirin, were assessed in a multicenter observational study. The relationship between renal function and bleeding event, defined as BARC 3 or 5, was determined using a marginal effect from the logit model and Royston-Parmar model. During an average 313.1 days of the observation period, defined as the duration of DAPT after admission until the implementation of a change in the regimen, bleeding events were observed in 7.4% of patients (n = 94). The estimated curves demonstrated that the probability of bleeding was positive correlated with renal dysfunction (6.0 to 8.6), regardless of the DAPT regimen used. This probability was consistently higher in clopidogrel (7.4 to 10.5) than in prasugrel (4.8 to 0.7). This trend was also shown in maintenance hemodialysis patients (6.7 vs. 10.3). Estimated cumulative incidences among individual stages of renal function were drawn. In conclusion, bleeding events increased with worsening renal function, and prasugrel is safer than clopidogrel as a component of DAPT throughout all levels of renal function, including hemodialysis patients after ACS.

Clopidogrel-Related High Residual Platelet Reactivity Associated with Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke.

INTRODUCTION: There are few studies on the relationship between the occurrence of clopidogrel-related high residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at admission in patients with ischemic stroke. The aim of this study was to investigate the possible relationship between the two. METHODS: Patients who were hospitalized and diagnosed with acute ischemic stroke were recruited from July 1, 2017, to June 30, 2018, at Shanghai TCM-Integrated Hospital. Renal function was measured within 24 h of enrollment and eGFR was calculated. Patients were tested for platelet reactivity using the VerifyNow system after 7 days of antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel 75 mg/d alone, and patients with P2Y12 reaction unit values ≥230 were diagnosed with HRPR. The association between HRPR and eGFR was analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 274 patients were enrolled in the study, of whom 91 (33.21%) had HRPR. Multivariate logistic regression analysis suggested that an increased risk of HRPR was independently associated with female sex and reduced eGFR (female sex: OR = 2.24, 95% CI: 1.26-3.99, p = 0.006; mild chronic kidney disease [CKD]: OR = 2.95, 95% CI: 1.47-5.93, p = 0.002; moderate CKD: OR = 3.07, 95% CI: 1.08-8.75, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Decreased eGFR is an independent risk factor for the occurrence of HRPR in patients with ischemic stroke.

Clopidogrel-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura: a case report.

Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is a rare variant of thrombotic microangiopathy. We report a case of TTP in a Nigerian chronic kidney disease (CKD) patient who was previously on clopidogrel. The features of TTP resolved soon after clopidogrel was withdrawn. Clopidogrel is a cardio-protective anti-platelet drug used in CKD patients at risk of dyspepsia. However, its potential to cause TTP should be recognized and considered in acute kidney injury (AKI) patients previously on clopidogrel.

Risk factors for gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with cerebral infarction after dual antiplatelet therapy.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the risk factors for gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with cerebral infarction after dual antiplatelet therapy. METHODS: Cerebral infarction patients who received dual antiplatelet therapy during January 2019 and December 2021 in Nanchang University Affiliated Ganzhou Hospital were included. Patients were divided into a bleeding group and a nonbleeding group. Propensity score matching was used to match the data between the two groups. The risk factors for cerebral infarction with gastrointestinal bleeding after receiving dual antiplatelet therapy were analyzed by conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: There were 2370 cerebral infarction patients who received dual antiplatelet therapy included in the study. There were significant differences between the bleeding group and the nonbleeding group in terms of sex, age, smoking, drinking, hypertension, coronary heart disease, diabetes and peptic ulcer before matching. After matching, 85 patients were included in the bleeding group and nonbleeding group, and there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of sex, age, smoking, drinking, previous cerebral infarction, hypertension, coronary heart disease, diabetes, gout or peptic ulcer. Conditional logistic regression analysis showed that long-term use of aspirin and severity of cerebral infarction were risk factors for gastrointestinal bleeding in cerebral infarction patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy, whereas the use of PPI was a protective factor against gastrointestinal bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term use of aspirin and severity of cerebral infarction are risk factors for gastrointestinal bleeding in cerebral infarction patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy. The use of PPIs could reduce the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding.

Variability of response on prophylactic prasugrel for endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: Clinical implications.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Prophylactic prasugrel for endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms has been introduced and increased, but HTPR (high on-treatment platelet reactivity) or LTPR (low on-treatment platelet reactivity) of prasugrel is not uncommon in clinical circumstances. To investigate the predisposing factors of HTPR and LTPR on prasugrel premedication in the neurointerventional field and to determine its clinical implications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between February 2016 and December 2020, 191 patients treated with coil embolization using prophylactic prasugrel in 234 intracranial aneurysms were the final candidates for this study. Patient and aneurysm characteristics, clinical status, and laboratory study values were carefully reviewed retrospectively. We performed risk factor analyses for HTPR and LTPR on prasugrel. RESULTS: Ultimately, 20 patients (10.5%) had HTPR, and 74 patients (38.7%) were categorized as having LTPR. In multivariable analyses, the factors related to HTPR were BMI (adjusted OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.04-1.41, p = 0.01), history of antithrombotics (adjusted OR 3.79, 95% CI 1.39-10.34, p = 0.01), and hematocrit (adjusted OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.84-0.99, p = 0.03). Low BMI was the only risk factor for LTPR (adjusted OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.76-0.94, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: In the neurointerventional field, high BMI and prior use of antithrombotic agents were related to HTPR, and low BMI was associated with LTPR on prophylactic prasugrel. High hematocrit levels decreased the risk of HTPR. When preparing endovascular treatment for intracranial aneurysms, attention to patients with these clinical features is required to address the possibility of ischemic or bleeding complications.

Atorvastatin Effect on Clopidogrel Efficacy in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease.

BACKGROUND: Both clopidogrel and atorvastatin metabolism are rooted in hepatic cytochrome p450 activation. There are published reports of atorvastatin interfering with clopidogrel metabolism by inhibiting the activation of clopidogrel. This in turn would decrease the therapeutic effect of clopidogrel potentially resulting in an increase in thrombotic events in patients who are taking both medications. The emergence of viscoelastic assays, such as Thromboelastography with platelet mapping (TEG-PM), has been utilized to identify prothrombotic states and may provide insight into a patient's microvascular coagulation profile. The aim of this prospective, observational study was to delineate the differences in platelet function between patients on clopidogrel alone versus those on clopidogrel and atorvastatin in patients that are undergoing peripheral revascularization. METHODS: All patients undergoing revascularization between December 2020 and August 2022 were prospectively evaluated. Patients on clopidogrel and atorvastatin were compared to those on clopidogrel alone. Serial perioperative TEG-PM analysis was performed up to 6 months postoperatively and the platelet function in terms of percent inhibition was evaluated in both groups. Statistical analysis was performed using unpaired t-test to identify differences in platelet function. RESULTS: Over the study period, a total of 182 patients were enrolled. Of this cohort 72 patients met study criteria. 87 samples from the 72 patients were analyzed. 31 (43.05%) patients were on clopidogrel alone and 41 (56.94%) were on clopidogrel and atorvastatin. Patients on clopidogrel alone showed significantly greater platelet inhibition compared to those on clopidogrel and atorvastatin [49.01% vs. 34.54%, P = 0.03]. There was no statistical difference in platelet inhibition between groups in terms of aspirin use alone versus aspirin and atorvastatin. CONCLUSIONS: Patients on clopidogrel and atorvastatin showed significantly less platelet inhibition compared to those on clopidogrel alone, supporting the concept that atorvastatin may interfere with the therapeutic effect of clopidogrel. Patients taking atorvastatin may require an alternative antiplatelet therapy regimen that does not include clopidogrel to achieve adequate thromboprophylaxis.

Impact of continued clopidogrel use on outcomes of patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of clopidogrel at the time of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and its association with postoperative complications. METHODS: Single-institution, retrospective review of a prospective database. RESULTS: From 2010 to 2017, CEA was performed in 1066 consecutive patients (median age, 73 years; 66% men). The indications for operation included ≥70% asymptomatic stenosis (458; 43%), prior stroke (314; 29%), and transient cerebral or retinal ischemia (294; 28%). At the time of operation, 509 (48%) patients were taking aspirin alone, 441 (41%) were taking clopidogrel (374 in combination with aspirin, 67 as sole therapy), 83 (8%) were on no documented antiplatelet medication, and 33 (3%) were taking warfarin (with therapeutic international normalized ratio). The likelihood of clopidogrel use at the time of operation was higher for patients with a history of symptomatic carotid disease (P = .002). Over the study period, clopidogrel use increased from 31.9% in 2010 to 56.8% in 2017, which corresponds to an 11% (95% confidence interval, 6%-15%) increase annually. Postoperative strokes occurred in 15 patients (overall incidence, 1.4%), the majority of which were minor (12/15; 80%). Six strokes occurred in patients taking aspirin alone (6/509; 1.2%), two in patients on clopidogrel and aspirin (2/441; 0.5%), two in patients taking clopidogrel alone (2/67; 2.9%), three in patients on no documented antiplatelet medication (3/83; 3.6%), and two in those taking warfarin (one of which was secondary to a fatal intracranial hemorrhage within 30 days of discharge [2/33; 6.1%]). The 30-day mortality rate was 0.03% (3/1066); the risk for the combined endpoint of any stroke, death, or myocardial infarction (MI) was 2.3% (25/1066), and the risk for major stroke, death, or MI was 1.2%. There was no apparent association between clopidogrel use and the incidence of postoperative bleeding (P = .59) or any other postoperative complication (stroke, death, MI, cranial nerve injury; P = .15). CONCLUSIONS: Clopidogrel use in our CEA practice has increased over time and has not been associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications, including bleeding. These data suggest that clopidogrel should not be discontinued prior to CEA and should be considered as part of 'optimal medical therapy' in patients undergoing CEA.

Clinical Impact of CYP2C19 Genotype on Clopidogrel-Based Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

BACKGROUND: Although there is a growing body of evidence that CYP2C19 genotyping can be beneficial when considering treatment with clopidogrel after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), whether a genotype-guided strategy can be generally adopted in routine practice remains unclear among East Asians. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to investigate long-term outcomes of patients undergoing clopidogrel-based antiplatelet therapy after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation according to CYP2C19 genotypes. METHODS: From the nationwide multicenter PTRG-DES (Platelet function and genoType-Related long-term proGnosis in DES-treated patients) consortium, patients who underwent CYP2C19 genotyping were selected and classified according to CYP2C19 loss-of-function allele: rapid metabolizers (RMs) or normal metabolizers (NMs) vs intermediate metabolizers (IMs) or poor metabolizers (PMs). The primary outcome was a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis at 5 years after the index procedure. RESULTS: Of 8,163 patients with CYP2C19 genotyping, 56.7% presented with acute coronary syndrome. There were 3,098 (37.9%) in the RM or NM group, 3,906 (47.9%) in the IM group, and 1,159 (14.2%) in the PM group. IMs or PMs were associated with an increased risk of 5-year primary outcome compared with RMs or NMs (HRadj: 1.42; 95% CI: 1.01-1.98; P = 0.041), and the effect was more pronounced in the first year (HRadj: 1.67; 95% CI: 1.10-2.55; P = 0.016). The prognostic implication of being an IM and PM was significant in acute coronary syndrome patients (HRadj: 1.88; 95% CI: 1.20-2.93; P = 0.005) but not in those with stable angina (HRadj: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.54-1.55; P = 0.751) (interaction P = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: Among East Asians with clopidogrel-based antiplatelet therapy after DES implantation, CYP2C19 genotyping could stratify patients who were likely to have an increased risk of atherothrombotic events. (Platelet Function and genoType-Related Long-term progGosis in DES-treated Patients: A Consortium From Multi-centered Registries [PTRG-DES]; NCT04734028).

Multiple genetic mutations increase the risk of thrombosis associated with clopidogrel after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Background: The effect of multiple mutations in CYP2C19, PON1 and ABCB1 genes on the effectiveness and safety of dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention remains unclear. Methods: In total, 263 Chinese Han patients were enrolled in this study. Platelet aggregation rates and thrombosis risk were used to compare clopidogrel responses and outcomes in patients with different numbers of genetic mutations. Results: Our study demonstrated that 74% of the patients carried more than two genetic mutations. High platelet aggregation rates were associated with genetic mutations in patients receiving clopidogrel and aspirin after percutaneous coronary intervention. Genetic mutations were closely related to the recurrence of thrombotic events, but not bleeding. The number of genes that become dysfunctional in patients is directly correlated with the risk of recurrent thrombosis. Conclusion: Compared with CYP2C19 alone or the platelet aggregation rate, it is more helpful to predict clinical outcomes by considering the polymorphisms of all three genes.

The effects of different combinations of mutations in the genes CYP2C19, PON1 and ABCB1 on the effectiveness and safety of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are unclear. In total, 263 Chinese Han patients receiving 75 mg clopidogrel and 100 mg aspirin daily for 12 months after PCI were enrolled in this study. ADP-induced platelet aggregation rates, thrombosis and bleeding risk were used to compare clopidogrel responses among the patients. Only 3.4% of patients had no mutations in CYP2C19, PON1 or ABCB1, and 74% of patients who chose to be genetically tested carried more than two mutations in these genes. High ADP-induced platelet aggregation rates in patients receiving clopidogrel and aspirin after PCI were associated with mutations in CYP2C19, PON1 and ABCB1. Patients with double or triple genetic mutations in CYP2C19, PON1 or ABCB1 had a higher risk of thrombosis within 18 months of follow-up. We conclude that multiple genetic polymorphisms influence platelet reactivity, bleeding and thrombosis risk during dual antiplatelet therapy after PCI.

Hypoglycemia as a potential risk for patients taking clopidogrel: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Clopidogrel is a cornerstone antiplatelet drug used in cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and peripheral artery diseases. The sulfhydryl group of clopidogrel metabolite could induce insulin autoimmune syndrome (IAS) with hypoglycemia as the major symptom. Discontinuing clopidogrel and substituting it with ticagrelor has been revealed as an effective treatment in previous studies. Since hypoglycemia serves as a risk factor for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, we aimed to determine the association between hypoglycemia/IAS and clopidogrel and to investigate whether clopidogrel is a modifiable and causal risk factor of hypoglycemia/IAS. Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane databases, and clinical trial registries were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of clopidogrel from inception to 28 February 2022. RCTs comparing clopidogrel with placebo or other antiplatelet drugs were eligible if meeting the inclusion criteria: 1) clopidogrel was administrated 75 mg qd orally as a long-term antiplatelet prescription at least for months, and 2) hypoglycemia-inducible drugs were not used in the control arm. One investigator abstracted articles and performed a quality assessment. Uncertainties were resolved by discussions with two investigators independently. Odds ratio (OR) and risk difference (RD) were calculated and performed with subgroup analyses. The pre-specified protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022299622). Results: Six trials with 61,399 participants in total fulfilled the criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. Clopidogrel might not be associated with higher hypoglycemia odds (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.40). However, Asian participants (p = 0.0437) seemed more likely to develop clopidogrel-associated hypoglycemia. Clopidogrel-associated hypoglycemia occurred at the highest rate of 0.03% (RD -0.00023, 95% CI -0.00077 to 0.00031), and this increased to 0.91% (RD 0.00210, 95% CI -0.00494 to 0.00914) in an aging population and to 0.18% (RD 0.00040, 95% CI -0.00096 to 0.00177) when Asian ratio of the population was elevated. Conclusions: We raise the concern that clopidogrel might be a modifiable and causal risk factor of hypoglycemia. The Asian population might be more vulnerable and need additional care. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, identifier CRD42022299622.

Ticagrelor inhibits platelet aggregation and reduces inflammatory burden more than clopidogrel in patients with stages 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease.

BACKGROUND: No study has compared pharmacologic properties of ticagrelor and clopidogrel in non-dialysis patients with stage 4-5 chronic kidney disease (CKD). METHODS: We conducted a double-blind RCT to compare effects of ticagrelor and clopidogrel in 48 CKD, with the primary outcome of ADP-induced platelet aggregation (WBPA) after 2 weeks of DAPT. In a parallel arm, we compared effects of 2 weeks of ticagrelor plus aspirin on mean changes in WBPA and markers of thromboinflammation among non-CKD controls (n = 26) with that of CKD in the ticagrelor-arm. RESULTS: Average age of CKD was 53.7 years, with 62% women, 54% African American, and 42% with stage 5 CKD. Ticagrelor generated statistically lower WBPA values post treatment [median 0 Ω (IQR 0, 2)] vs. clopidogrel [median 0 Ω (IQR 0, 5)] (P = 0.002); percent inhibition of WBPA was greater (87 ± 22% vs. 63 ± 50%; P = 0.04; and plasma IL-6 levels were much lower (8.42 ± 1.73 pg/ml vs. 18.48 ± 26.56 pg/ml; P = 0.04). No differences in mean changes in WBPA between CKD-ticagrelor and control groups were observed. Ticagrelor- DAPT reduced levels of IL-1α and IL-1ß in CKD-ticagrelor and control groups, attenuated lowering of TNFα and TRAIL levels in CKD-ticagrelor (vs controls), and had global changes in correlation between various cytokines in a subgroup of CKD-ticagrelor subjects not on statins (n = 10). Peak/trough levels of ticagrelor/metabolite were not different between CKD-ticagrelor and control groups. CONCLUSIONS: We report significant differences in platelet aggregation and anti-inflammatory properties between ticagrelor- and clopidogrel-based DAPT in non-dialysis people with stage 4-5 CKD. These notable inflammatory responses suggest ticagrelor-based DAPT might lower inflammatory burden of asymptomatic patients with stage 4 or 5 CKD. (clinicaltrials.gov # NCT03649711).

A Systematic Review of Clopidogrel Resistance in Vascular Surgery: Current Perspectives and Future Directions.

BACKGROUND: Clopidogrel resistance is a well-described phenomenon that has been linked to adverse cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease. The impact of clopidogrel resistance in patient outcomes after vascular and endovascular surgery is not well-established. METHODS: Using preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a literature review with the medical subject headings (MeSH) terms "(clopidogrel resistance) and (vascular)", "(clopidogrel resistance) and (vascular surgery)", "(clopidogrel resistance) and (endovascular)", and "(clopidogrel resistance) and (endovascular surgery)" was performed in PubMed and Cochrane databases, to identify all peer-reviewed studies performed on clopidogrel resistance in vascular and endovascular surgery. Studies written in the English language from inception to 2022 were included. Case reports, studies with limited information, nonhuman studies, and studies not pertaining to vascular or endovascular surgery were excluded from analysis. Each study was independently reviewed by 2 qualified researchers to assess eligibility. RESULTS: Of the 691 studies identified through the MeSH strategy, 16 studies met the inclusion criteria and were reviewed and summarized. These studies focused on extracranial cerebrovascular disease (n = 5) and peripheral arterial disease (PAD, n = 11), encompassing a total of 1,716 patients. The prevalence of clopidogrel resistance ranged from 0% to 83.3%, depending on the diagnostic assay and cutoff values used. In cerebrovascular disease, clopidogrel resistance may be associated with cerebral embolization, ischemic neurologic events, and vascular-related mortality. In PAD, clopidogrel resistance has been linked to recurrent stent thrombosis, target lesion revascularization, amputation-free survival, and all-cause mortality. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review provides an up-to-date summary of clopidogrel resistance in vascular and endovascular surgery. The impact of clopidogrel resistance remains incompletely investigated, and future studies are needed to clarify the role of resistance testing in patients with vascular disease.

Comparison of Cilostazol versus Clopidogrel in Addition to Aspirin in Patients with Ischemic Stroke who Underwent Intracranial or Extracranial Artery Stent Implantation.

AIMS: The role of cilostazol after intracranial or extracranial artery stent implantation is still unclear. Therefore, we designed this trial to explore the efficacy and safety of cilostazol in this particular population. METHODS: In this retrospective study, patients were divided into the cilostazol or clopidogrel group by the antiplatelet therapy received after artery stent implantation. The primary efficacy endpoint was ischemic stroke. Bleeding events and other antiplatelet drug-related adverse reactions (ADRs) were also recorded. Neurological function prognosis was evaluated by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) after discharge. RESULTS: A total of 156 patients were enrolled; 56 underwent intracranial artery stenting, 95 underwent extracranial artery stenting, and 5 underwent intracranial combined with extracranial artery stenting. Any stroke and bleeding events in the hospital of the two groups were comparable (P=0.38, P=0.34, respectively). The incidence of stroke recurrence tended to be lower in the cilostazol group, although not significant (cilostazol vs. clopidogrel, 1.35% vs. 4.88%, P=0.25). There was a significant difference of any bleeding events between the two groups (cilostazol vs. clopidogrel, 5.41% vs. 20.73%, P=0.02). During follow-up, we did not observe an apparent increase of ADRs in the cilostazol group (cilostazol vs. clopidogrel, palpitation 4.05% vs. 2.44%, P=0.58; gastrointestinal discomfort events 8.11% vs. 12.20%, P=0.80). There were no differences between the two groups of neurological function prognosis (P=0.29). CONCLUSIONS: Cilostazol-based dual antiplatelet therapy could be recommended as an effective and safe therapy regimen among patients undergoing intracranial or extracranial artery stent implantation.

Impact of renal failure and high-platelet reactivity on major cardiovascular ischemic events among patients with acute coronary syndrome receiving dual antiplatelet therapy with ticagrelor.

BACKGROUND: No study has so far evaluated the impact of chronic kidney disease (CKD) on high-on treatment platelet reactivity (HRPR) with ticagrelor and their prognostic consequences, that were therefore the aim of the present study. METHODS: Patients on dual antiplatelet therapy with ASA+ticagrelor (90mg/twice a day) after percutaneous coronary revascularization for ACS were scheduled for platelet function assessment 30-90 days post-discharge. The primary study endpoint was defined as the occurrence of major cardiovascular events (a composite of cardiovascular death, recurrent acute coronary syndrome (MI), target vessel revascularization) at the longest available follow-up. RESULTS: We included 396 patients, that were divided according to CKD (eGFR

Impact of Pancreatic ß-Cell Function on Clopidogrel Responsiveness and Outcomes in Chinese Nondiabetic Patients Undergoing Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

PURPOSE: Insulin resistance and ß-cell dysfunction are fundamental defects contributing to type 2 diabetes development. Prior studies indicated that insulin resistance may be correlated with low responsiveness to clopidogrel. This study aimed to investigate the effects of ß-cell function on clopidogrel-induced platelet P2Y12 inhibition and the clinical outcomes of nondiabetic patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: Patients scheduled to undergo elective PCI and receive clopidogrel in addition to aspirin were recruited for this study. Homeostatic model assessment 2 of ß-cell function (HOMA2-ß%) was used to classify participants into quartiles. Thromboelastography (TEG) was used to calculate the quantitative platelet inhibition rate to assess clopidogrel-induced antiplatelet reactivity. The clinical outcome was major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs). RESULTS: Of the 784 participants evaluated, 21.3% of them (169 of 784) had low responsiveness to clopidogrel. According to multivariate linear regression analysis, the first quartile of HOMA2-ß% (19.9-78.1), indicating greater ß-cell dysfunction, was independently associated with low responsiveness to clopidogrel compared with the fourth quartile (126.8-326.2) after adjustment for potential covariates [odds ratio 2.140, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.336 to 3.570), P = 0.038]. In addition, at one year, the first quartile of HOMA2-ß% was associated with an increased risk of 1-year MACCE occurrence compared with the fourth quartile [adjusted hazard ratio 4.989, 95% CI (1.571 to 15.845), P = 0.006]. CONCLUSION: Increased ß-cell dysfunction, indicated by a low HOMA2-ß%, was associated with low responsiveness to clopidogrel and an increased risk of one-year MACCEs in nondiabetic patients undergoing elective PCI.

Clopidogrel resistance is common in patients undergoing vascular and coronary interventions.

OBJECTIVES: "Clopidogrel resistance," also defined as heightened platelet reactivity (HPR) while on clopidogrel therapy, may lead to a sub-optimal antiplatelet effect and a potential thrombotic event. There is limited literature addressing the prevalence of HPR in a large cohort of patients receiving either coronary or endovascular interventions. METHODS: In a large integrated healthcare system, patients with a P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) test were identified. HPR was defined as a PRU ≥ 200 during clopidogrel therapy. Vascular and coronary interventions were identified utilizing CPT codes, HPR prevalence was calculated, and Fischer's exact test was used to determine significance. RESULTS: From an initial cohort of 2,405,957 patients (October 2014 to January 2020), we identified 3301 patients with PRU tests administered. Of these, 1789 tests had a PRU ≥ 200 (HPR overall prevalence, 54%). We then identified 1195 patients who underwent either an endovascular or coronary procedure and had a PRU measurement. This corresponded to 935 coronary and 260 endovascular interventions. In the coronary cohort, the HPR prevalence was 54% (503/935). In the vascular cohort, the HPR prevalence was 53% (137/260); there was no difference between cohorts in HPR prevalence (p = 0.78). CONCLUSION: "Clopidogrel resistance" or HPR was found to be present in nearly half of patients with cardiovascular disease undergoing intervention. Our data suggest HPR is more common in the cardiovascular patient population than previously appreciated. Evaluating patients for HPR is both inexpensive ($25) and rapid (< 10 min). Future randomized studies are warranted to determine whether HPR has a clinically detectable effect on revascularization outcomes.